The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) is seeking proposals to develop recommendations that modify the Individual Transferrable Quota (ITQ) Programs for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries in federal waters. These recommendations would identify ways to remove barriers to entry and increase the utilization of quotas.
Background
Established in 1976 under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Mid-Atlantic Council is one of eight regional U.S. councils responsible for developing Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) to prevent overfishing and rebuild stocks in federal waters. In 1977, the Council developed an FMP for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. This plan initially relied on a combination of limited entry, quotas, and time limits to constrain landings and effort. This regulatory approach evolved, and in 1990, the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog ITQ Programs became the first Limited Access Privilege Program (LAPP) established in the U.S.
Despite the ITQ program's design—where transferability rules theoretically facilitate new entry via the open transfer of allocation permits and quota shares—a recent program review noted significant consolidation over time (fewer vessels and processors) and persistent barriers to entry. This process has been described as a "one-way trip," with virtually no new entrants into these fisheries over the last few decades. Current quota utilization rates are low: in 2025, only 34 percent of the Atlantic surfclam ITQ quota and 35 percent of the ocean quahog ITQ quota were utilized. While these ITQ quotas were set at sustainable levels to meet expected market demand and achieve optimum yield, they are currently heavily underutilized.
On April 17, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order (EO) 14276, Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness. The EO directs federal agencies to “address unfair trade practices, eliminate unsafe imports, level the unfair playing field that has benefited foreign fishing companies, promote ethical sourcing, reduce regulatory burdens, and ensure the integrity of the seafood supply chain.” Specifically, Section 4 of EO 14276 directs the eight regional U.S. councils to identify actions to “stabilize markets, improve access, enhance profitability, and prevent fishery closures.” As a direct result of this mandate, the Council has committed to developing a document that explores modifications to its ITQ programs for both Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog.
Scope of Work
The contractor(s) shall develop a comprehensive report containing specific, actionable recommendations for modifying the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog ITQ programs to effectively eliminate barriers to entry and maximize quota utilization in these fisheries. The final submission must include an Executive Summary that succinctly presents the key findings and recommendations to the Council. The core of the report is expected to provide thorough background, relevant literature, and rigorous analysis to substantiate all proposed recommendations. The contractor should expect to present the final report in-person at a Council Meeting, with the specific meeting to be determined upon report completion.
The contractor(s) will regularly meet with a project oversight team comprised of Council and NOAA Fisheries staff, to ensure the scope of work proposed under this contract is addressed and to ensure product utility. This team will provide any technical input needed, facilitate data access agreements (if needed), direct the contractor to any regional or fishery specific expertise, and assist the contractor with details needed to support the contractor's completion of this project.
Contractor Qualifications
Minimum qualifications require experience in fisheries economics, social sciences, or natural resource economics, coupled with both theoretical and empirical expertise in fisheries management and demonstrated strong skills in data analysis.
How to Apply
Applicants should submit a proposal to Dr. Chris Moore, Executive Director, by email (admin@mafmc.org) by 11:59 pm on March 31, 2026. Proposals should not exceed 20 pages total (excluding curriculum vitae) and should include the following elements:
Executive Summary: A summary of the proposed scope of work as well as a brief overview of the applicant’s qualifications.
Proposed Scope of Work: A detailed plan for addressing the scope of work described above. This should include a summary of potential analysis approaches, a project schedule, a summary of how the project will be managed, and a list of all personnel who may work on the project.
Qualifications of Applicant: A summary of the qualifications of the applicant and other team members, if applicable. Curriculum vitae should be included for all individuals who will work on the project.
Proposed Budget: A detailed budget, including the basis for the charges (e.g., hourly rates, fixed fees).
Timeline
January 7, 2026: Issuance of RFP
March 31, 2026: Deadline for proposal submission
May 1, 2026: Notify selected contractor
May 29, 2026: Contract execution (by this date or prior)
June 1, 2026: Project begins
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated based on prior experience, references and qualifications, and proposal costs. The Council may request additional information as deemed necessary to clarify or negotiate modifications to the proposal.
Requests for Further Information/Contact
Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
800 North State Street, Suite 201
Dover, DE 19901
tel: 302-526-5255
email: cmoore@mafmc.org
Disclaimer
All costs associated with preparation and presentation of the proposal will be borne by applicants.
Proposals and their accompanying documentation will not be returned.
Respondents must disclose any relevant conflicts of interest and/or pending civil/criminal legal actions.
The Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all applications received, negotiate with all qualified applicants, cancel or modify this request for proposals in part or in its entirety, or change the application guidelines, when it is in its best interests.